Archive for the 'Law Firms' Category
Still Loading: Law Firms Lag Behind the Rest of Corporate America on the Web
September 2nd, 2008AM Law Daily: - “While Womble and others are accessorizing their sites with podcasts, blogs, videos, and rss feeds, many other firms remain entrenched in the world of Web 1.0″
Maybe these firms should talk to an expert.
LawLibraryThing
January 10th, 2008Law Libraries (13 of em), meet LibraryThing.
Marketing Ahead of The Curve
October 15th, 2007Micah Buchdahl - “Many lawyers like to be trendy and fashionable. In law firm marketing circles, you are not exactly Nostradamus when advising people with incredible predictions of “new” marketing ideas—blogs, podcasts, annual reports, CRM systems—among them. They were new and trendy many years ago, and most catch on just about the time advanced marketers [...]
No More Billable Hour
October 12th, 2007Ann Althouse - “Fast work is a good thing. How hateful to be embedded in a system that rewards inefficiency.”
We <3 PACER
September 14th, 2007U.S. Courts - “Back in the paper world, we constantly had law firm runners who came to the clerk’s office to make copies of case files. They’d have to drive to the courthouse, find a parking place, feed the meter, and pay 50 cents per copy. Helping them consumed a lot of staff time,” she [...]
State of the AmLaw 200 Blogosphere
August 20th, 2007LexBlog - “LexBlog is pleased to provide you findings on who from the AMLaw 200 has entered the blogosphere.”
Law-Lit
August 10th, 2007NYLJ - “The editor of a soon-to-be-published collection of literary musings on the world of jurisprudence touts his anthology as proof “beyond any reasonable doubt that no sphere of the human experience is as alluring and lurid, lamentable and lust-provoking as the law.”
Re-Ranking the Rankings
August 7th, 2007Steve Matthews - “The following list re-ranks the 2006 Global 100 Law Firms (originally published by The Lawyer) by the number of web pages indexed within the search engines. The tool chosen for this count was Yahoo Site Explorer, which is generally more comprehensive than the Google site: command.”