<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do We Need a Simpler RSS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/12/08/do-we-need-a-simpler-rss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/12/08/do-we-need-a-simpler-rss/</link>
	<description>The library weblog dedicated to resources for keeping current and professional development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:33:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Spry</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/12/08/do-we-need-a-simpler-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-26433</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Spry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/12/08/do-we-need-a-simpler-rss/#comment-26433</guid>
		<description>The integration of RSS capibilities into existing, familiar clients like e-mail and web browsers is a step in the right direction.  Web sites should automatically prompt users as they are leaving, asking if they would like to be notified of updates.  Then you would need an effective alerting mechanism within the browser, &quot;live bookmarks&quot; isn&#039;t it.  Maybe a return of the scrolling marquees of the past, I don&#039;t know, but there is much improvement to be had all around.

The term &quot;RSS&quot; and &quot;feeds&quot; is pure jargon.  It must get beyond that point.

E-mailing updates is quite possibly the killer app, but e-mail clients really need to be able to filter such updates into folders.

&quot;Have updates e-mailed to you&quot; sounds a million times more friendly than download this software, or use this new software, learning something new, click on this icon, etc.  People already know how to use e-mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The integration of RSS capibilities into existing, familiar clients like e-mail and web browsers is a step in the right direction.  Web sites should automatically prompt users as they are leaving, asking if they would like to be notified of updates.  Then you would need an effective alerting mechanism within the browser, &#8220;live bookmarks&#8221; isn&#8217;t it.  Maybe a return of the scrolling marquees of the past, I don&#8217;t know, but there is much improvement to be had all around.</p>
<p>The term &#8220;RSS&#8221; and &#8220;feeds&#8221; is pure jargon.  It must get beyond that point.</p>
<p>E-mailing updates is quite possibly the killer app, but e-mail clients really need to be able to filter such updates into folders.</p>
<p>&#8220;Have updates e-mailed to you&#8221; sounds a million times more friendly than download this software, or use this new software, learning something new, click on this icon, etc.  People already know how to use e-mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie Crosby</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/12/08/do-we-need-a-simpler-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-26432</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/12/08/do-we-need-a-simpler-rss/#comment-26432</guid>
		<description>Point well taken--I agree most people are using it without realizing it. And most may not need to be able to set things up. As librarians, I see our role as curators of content, so we should be able to work with feeds (admittedly, I am still learning how to mix and filter feeds myself). Most of us have a long way to go before we are at that proficient.

There was a really good suggestion on my blog just now--a feed could be an icon dropped onto your desktop, that you could then move to add where you want.I&#039;m thinking that&#039;s a great idea. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point well taken&#8211;I agree most people are using it without realizing it. And most may not need to be able to set things up. As librarians, I see our role as curators of content, so we should be able to work with feeds (admittedly, I am still learning how to mix and filter feeds myself). Most of us have a long way to go before we are at that proficient.</p>
<p>There was a really good suggestion on my blog just now&#8211;a feed could be an icon dropped onto your desktop, that you could then move to add where you want.I&#8217;m thinking that&#8217;s a great idea. <img src='http://www.librarystuff.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/12/08/do-we-need-a-simpler-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-26431</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/12/08/do-we-need-a-simpler-rss/#comment-26431</guid>
		<description>For many people, they are using RSS and don&#039;t even know it.  I&#039;d love to see figures that discuss adoptions numbers.  Also, maybe not everyone &quot;needs&quot; to use RSS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For many people, they are using RSS and don&#8217;t even know it.  I&#8217;d love to see figures that discuss adoptions numbers.  Also, maybe not everyone &#8220;needs&#8221; to use RSS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie Crosby</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/12/08/do-we-need-a-simpler-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-26430</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/12/08/do-we-need-a-simpler-rss/#comment-26430</guid>
		<description>Why, then, are not more people using it? I agree, it can be explained fairly readily (heck, just the Common Craft video alone does the trick) but I&#039;m thinking we still have a long way to go with adoption.

Cheers!
Connie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why, then, are not more people using it? I agree, it can be explained fairly readily (heck, just the Common Craft video alone does the trick) but I&#8217;m thinking we still have a long way to go with adoption.</p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
Connie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.librarystuff.net/2008/12/08/do-we-need-a-simpler-rss/feed/ ) in 0.32540 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 10:43 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 11:43 am UTC -->
