<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should libraries develop their own e-book reader?â€™</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/08/12/should-libraries-develop-their-own-e-book-reader%e2%80%99/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/08/12/should-libraries-develop-their-own-e-book-reader%e2%80%99/</link>
	<description>The library weblog dedicated to resources for keeping current and professional development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Norm</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/08/12/should-libraries-develop-their-own-e-book-reader%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-24986</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/08/12/should-libraries-develop-their-own-e-book-reader%e2%80%99/#comment-24986</guid>
		<description>Maybe libraries shouldn&#039;t, but how about OCLC?  How about one of the larger electronic repository projects?  These groups might even have a vested interest in developing a reader that could accept a variety of formats at a widely acceptable price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe libraries shouldn&#8217;t, but how about OCLC?  How about one of the larger electronic repository projects?  These groups might even have a vested interest in developing a reader that could accept a variety of formats at a widely acceptable price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
