<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New from Bloglines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/02/27/new-from-bloglines-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/02/27/new-from-bloglines-2/</link>
	<description>The library weblog dedicated to resources for keeping current and professional development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:33:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/02/27/new-from-bloglines-2/comment-page-1/#comment-20137</link>
		<dc:creator>walt crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/02/27/new-from-bloglines-2/#comment-20137</guid>
		<description>Oops. One slight correction: That&#039;s 1,400 sessions a day; 2,500-2,600 page views. Still chump change compared to, say, Library Stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops. One slight correction: That&#8217;s 1,400 sessions a day; 2,500-2,600 page views. Still chump change compared to, say, Library Stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/02/27/new-from-bloglines-2/comment-page-1/#comment-20106</link>
		<dc:creator>walt crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/02/27/new-from-bloglines-2/#comment-20106</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is Google Reader still kicking Bloglines?&quot; 

I&#039;m not aware that GR ever was &quot;kicking&quot; Bloglines. I don&#039;t know of usage figures (they may be out there, but...), and GR is more opaque about per-list subscriptions (well, GR is wholly opaque, where Bloglines lets you see how many subscribers there are to various blogs).

I know my own situation, with Walt at Random:

The Feedburner feed shows 181 Google Reader and 77 Bloglines out of a total of 322--BUT my Bloglines total is 506. Since GR is much newer, I&#039;m guessing most GR subscriptions are via Feedburner. If that&#039;s true, then Bloglines represents much more of my audience. (The big picture? Who knows? I do full-text feeds, so the average of 1,400 page views a day doesn&#039;t necessarily relate directly to feed numbers: There&#039;s no compelling reason for someone to click through unless they want to comment.)

My *guess* is that more people use Bloglines--but I sure can&#039;t prove that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is Google Reader still kicking Bloglines?&#8221; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not aware that GR ever was &#8220;kicking&#8221; Bloglines. I don&#8217;t know of usage figures (they may be out there, but&#8230;), and GR is more opaque about per-list subscriptions (well, GR is wholly opaque, where Bloglines lets you see how many subscribers there are to various blogs).</p>
<p>I know my own situation, with Walt at Random:</p>
<p>The Feedburner feed shows 181 Google Reader and 77 Bloglines out of a total of 322&#8211;BUT my Bloglines total is 506. Since GR is much newer, I&#8217;m guessing most GR subscriptions are via Feedburner. If that&#8217;s true, then Bloglines represents much more of my audience. (The big picture? Who knows? I do full-text feeds, so the average of 1,400 page views a day doesn&#8217;t necessarily relate directly to feed numbers: There&#8217;s no compelling reason for someone to click through unless they want to comment.)</p>
<p>My *guess* is that more people use Bloglines&#8211;but I sure can&#8217;t prove that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.librarystuff.net/2008/02/27/new-from-bloglines-2/feed/ ) in 0.31832 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 12:00 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 1:00 pm UTC -->
