<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Short Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/01/30/on-short-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/01/30/on-short-books/</link>
	<description>The library weblog dedicated to resources for keeping current and professional development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:33:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessi</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/01/30/on-short-books/comment-page-1/#comment-18501</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/01/30/on-short-books/#comment-18501</guid>
		<description>Harry Potter has done more to &quot;save&quot; reading than about any other book published in the last decade. Short is the last word I&#039;d use to describe JK&#039;s writing style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Potter has done more to &#8220;save&#8221; reading than about any other book published in the last decade. Short is the last word I&#8217;d use to describe JK&#8217;s writing style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/01/30/on-short-books/comment-page-1/#comment-18361</link>
		<dc:creator>walt crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 21:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2008/01/30/on-short-books/#comment-18361</guid>
		<description>Save? I didn&#039;t even know it was lost!

Since a lot of nonfiction books these days are novella length, Graff actually has an interesting point. SFWA defines a novella as between 17,500 and 40,000 words; you&#039;ll find a lot of library books and other nonfiction books coming in under the 40,000-word mark (including First Have Something to Say, to be sure). [A typical issue of Cites &amp; Insights is novella-length, but only as a whole.]

There are many great novellas. There are many great longer novels. People keep buying more books and checking more books out from libraries. Somehow, somewhere, I don&#039;t believe reading ever got lost...quite apart from all that onscreen reading we all do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Save? I didn&#8217;t even know it was lost!</p>
<p>Since a lot of nonfiction books these days are novella length, Graff actually has an interesting point. SFWA defines a novella as between 17,500 and 40,000 words; you&#8217;ll find a lot of library books and other nonfiction books coming in under the 40,000-word mark (including First Have Something to Say, to be sure). [A typical issue of Cites &amp; Insights is novella-length, but only as a whole.]</p>
<p>There are many great novellas. There are many great longer novels. People keep buying more books and checking more books out from libraries. Somehow, somewhere, I don&#8217;t believe reading ever got lost&#8230;quite apart from all that onscreen reading we all do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.librarystuff.net/2008/01/30/on-short-books/feed/ ) in 0.30872 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 7:24 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 8:24 am UTC -->
