<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watching and Reading.  Same Difference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/11/19/watching-and-reading-same-difference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/11/19/watching-and-reading-same-difference/</link>
	<description>The library weblog dedicated to resources for keeping current and professional development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:33:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarynW</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/11/19/watching-and-reading-same-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-15441</link>
		<dc:creator>CarynW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/11/19/watching-and-reading-same-difference/#comment-15441</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think so, because watching TV engages your brain differently than reading.  It&#039;s easier to do something else, or be distracted, while watching TV than while reading; it&#039;s also possible to retain a memory that is made up of not just the program you&#039;re actually watching, but of commercials or other programs surfed to during commercials, and think all of the information you&#039;re remembering came from the show.

On the other hand, if you are a visual/graphic or an auditory/graphic learner, as opposed to a visual/verbal learner (my own terms - I don&#039;t know what the official terms are), the graphic and audio content of TV might engage you better than the silent all-verbal content of a book.  That said, though, it&#039;s still not the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think so, because watching TV engages your brain differently than reading.  It&#8217;s easier to do something else, or be distracted, while watching TV than while reading; it&#8217;s also possible to retain a memory that is made up of not just the program you&#8217;re actually watching, but of commercials or other programs surfed to during commercials, and think all of the information you&#8217;re remembering came from the show.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you are a visual/graphic or an auditory/graphic learner, as opposed to a visual/verbal learner (my own terms &#8211; I don&#8217;t know what the official terms are), the graphic and audio content of TV might engage you better than the silent all-verbal content of a book.  That said, though, it&#8217;s still not the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.librarystuff.net/2007/11/19/watching-and-reading-same-difference/feed/ ) in 0.32268 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 10:24 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 11:24 am UTC -->
