Comments on: ATM Machine http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/26/atm-machine/ The library weblog dedicated to resources for keeping current and professional development Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:33:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: RCN http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/26/atm-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-13653 RCN Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:44:03 +0000 http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/26/atm-machine/#comment-13653 I agree with Walt! For example, how do you say the year 1904? "Nineteen zero four?" On the other hand, I'm picky about "PIN," which, as PIN Number, is redundant. I agree with Walt! For example, how do you say the year 1904? “Nineteen zero four?”

On the other hand, I’m picky about “PIN,” which, as PIN Number, is redundant.

]]> By: walt crawford http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/26/atm-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-13646 walt crawford Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:13:46 +0000 http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/26/atm-machine/#comment-13646 I disagree. It's web two point oh if people choose to say it that way. The number that's one less than one has been pronounced "oh" far too often and in too many circumstances to say it's suddenly wrong. I disagree. It’s web two point oh if people choose to say it that way. The number that’s one less than one has been pronounced “oh” far too often and in too many circumstances to say it’s suddenly wrong.

]]>