<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reasons Why I Didn&#8217;t Make the Cut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/</link>
	<description>The library weblog dedicated to resources for keeping current and professional development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 04:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vonjobi</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-11719</link>
		<dc:creator>vonjobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/#comment-11719</guid>
		<description>i think part of the problem is SEO-related. if you&#039;ll notice, most of those on the list had the word &quot;librarian&quot; in the name of the blog. and you&#039;re right, you&#039;re not indexed by technorati. it&#039;s amazing that everyone is linking to this post, but your blog doesn&#039;t even show up in a list of blogs linking to the oedb post.

my own question is this: why bloglines? feedburner is more accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think part of the problem is SEO-related. if you&#8217;ll notice, most of those on the list had the word &#8220;librarian&#8221; in the name of the blog. and you&#8217;re right, you&#8217;re not indexed by technorati. it&#8217;s amazing that everyone is linking to this post, but your blog doesn&#8217;t even show up in a list of blogs linking to the oedb post.</p>
<p>my own question is this: why bloglines? feedburner is more accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-11432</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/#comment-11432</guid>
		<description>You were robbed Cohen. Robbed I say!

I&#039;ll trade you my #17 for a bucket of chicken. Deal? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were robbed Cohen. Robbed I say!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll trade you my #17 for a bucket of chicken. Deal? <img src='http://www.librarystuff.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bigwood</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-11335</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bigwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/#comment-11335</guid>
		<description>Not a very good survey. One that misses you and Meritith and Michael Stephens needs to be fixed rather than published. Makes me feel better about not making the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a very good survey. One that misses you and Meritith and Michael Stephens needs to be fixed rather than published. Makes me feel better about not making the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-11333</link>
		<dc:creator>walt crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/#comment-11333</guid>
		<description>OK, I&#039;ll say it: Flawed as they were, my two studies of liblogs and their reach made a whole lot more sense than the OEDb list. A *lot* more.

And I can say that, since I&#039;m #8 (for what that&#039;s worth--add $2 and it will get me a cup of coffee).

I did apparently pick up 17 referrals thanks to the post. That resulted in yesterday&#039;s numbers being...exactly the same as Monday&#039;s number. Somehow, I&#039;m guessing the huge international honor isn&#039;t going to help my job situation much...

And, as I said on my own blog, I&#039;m guessing my &quot;proper rank&quot; (whatever that might mean) is somewhere between #25 and #60, and maybe lower than that...but hey, as Ryan says, we milk these things for what they&#039;re worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I&#8217;ll say it: Flawed as they were, my two studies of liblogs and their reach made a whole lot more sense than the OEDb list. A *lot* more.</p>
<p>And I can say that, since I&#8217;m #8 (for what that&#8217;s worth&#8211;add $2 and it will get me a cup of coffee).</p>
<p>I did apparently pick up 17 referrals thanks to the post. That resulted in yesterday&#8217;s numbers being&#8230;exactly the same as Monday&#8217;s number. Somehow, I&#8217;m guessing the huge international honor isn&#8217;t going to help my job situation much&#8230;</p>
<p>And, as I said on my own blog, I&#8217;m guessing my &#8220;proper rank&#8221; (whatever that might mean) is somewhere between #25 and #60, and maybe lower than that&#8230;but hey, as Ryan says, we milk these things for what they&#8217;re worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Connell</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-11251</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/#comment-11251</guid>
		<description>Not that you need the kudos, but I&#039;ve been sifting the library blogosphere for a couple of years as a professional development tool. 

At the moment, there are only 4 feeds I look at on a daily basis, a decision based on personal utility versus the time it takes me to read them. Library Stuff is one of the four and has never been &quot;on the bubble&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that you need the kudos, but I&#8217;ve been sifting the library blogosphere for a couple of years as a professional development tool. </p>
<p>At the moment, there are only 4 feeds I look at on a daily basis, a decision based on personal utility versus the time it takes me to read them. Library Stuff is one of the four and has never been &#8220;on the bubble&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-11233</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/#comment-11233</guid>
		<description>Steven, it&#039;s really hard to make the cut if you aren&#039;t in the mix in the first place. Given that the data for the entire set only shows 55 sites, and Library Stuff was not among them....

[Neither was TameTheWeb, BTW. But I&#039;d argue that both you and Michael have a lot more &quot;influence&quot; than many of the folks in the top 25. So unless they revise their criteria a bit to include more library blogs, I think the results need to be taken with more than a few grains of salt.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven, it&#8217;s really hard to make the cut if you aren&#8217;t in the mix in the first place. Given that the data for the entire set only shows 55 sites, and Library Stuff was not among them&#8230;.</p>
<p>[Neither was TameTheWeb, BTW. But I'd argue that both you and Michael have a lot more "influence" than many of the folks in the top 25. So unless they revise their criteria a bit to include more library blogs, I think the results need to be taken with more than a few grains of salt.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-11230</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/#comment-11230</guid>
		<description>Greg:  I was a DMOZ editor once as well and gave it up because it just became annoying to deal with them.

Michelle:  Aw!  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg:  I was a DMOZ editor once as well and gave it up because it just became annoying to deal with them.</p>
<p>Michelle:  Aw!  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle McLean</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-11229</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle McLean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/#comment-11229</guid>
		<description>Steven,

You&#039;re top ten in my book and yes it was weird, lots of good quality stuff was missed - top ranking stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re top ten in my book and yes it was weird, lots of good quality stuff was missed &#8211; top ranking stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-11227</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/#comment-11227</guid>
		<description>Guess who the last dedicated editor of the LIS Weblogs category at DMOZ was? Exactly. And I resigned that position in April of 2004. 

The criteria used in forming that list is laughable at best. Top 200 in Google results for &quot;librarian blog?&quot; DMOZ? Subdomain of a non-librarian blog domain (i.e., xxyyzz.lishost.com)? Let&#039;s exclude everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess who the last dedicated editor of the LIS Weblogs category at DMOZ was? Exactly. And I resigned that position in April of 2004. </p>
<p>The criteria used in forming that list is laughable at best. Top 200 in Google results for &#8220;librarian blog?&#8221; DMOZ? Subdomain of a non-librarian blog domain (i.e., xxyyzz.lishost.com)? Let&#8217;s exclude everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-11226</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/09/04/reasons-why-i-didnt-make-the-cut/#comment-11226</guid>
		<description>Milk away Ryan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Milk away Ryan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
