<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Dewey For You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/</link>
	<description>The library weblog dedicated to resources for keeping current and professional development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:33:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: iLibrarian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dewey who?</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-8748</link>
		<dc:creator>iLibrarian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dewey who?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/#comment-8748</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m really wondering about the catalogue record? [From: Library Stuff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m really wondering about the catalogue record? [From: Library Stuff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Lafitte</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-8613</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Lafitte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/#comment-8613</guid>
		<description>As I posted elsewhere on this topic, it is extremely idiotic  for them to use bookstores as a model. I&#039;ve had two experiences where it took a very long period of time, one was 20 minutes of searching and the other took 3 days to find the book, and do not think it&#039;s feasible. While Dewey may have it&#039;s problems, I use NLM and LC at my library, it is very simple to use, I was using it as a third grader in school, and efficient.

  As for going back to Dewey, that is  a solution, IF they can keep track of the the books. I have a funny feeling that, depending upon the size of the library, it may take several days to weeks to track down the books, label them, and organize them. During that time, the library would have to close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I posted elsewhere on this topic, it is extremely idiotic  for them to use bookstores as a model. I&#8217;ve had two experiences where it took a very long period of time, one was 20 minutes of searching and the other took 3 days to find the book, and do not think it&#8217;s feasible. While Dewey may have it&#8217;s problems, I use NLM and LC at my library, it is very simple to use, I was using it as a third grader in school, and efficient.</p>
<p>  As for going back to Dewey, that is  a solution, IF they can keep track of the the books. I have a funny feeling that, depending upon the size of the library, it may take several days to weeks to track down the books, label them, and organize them. During that time, the library would have to close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New to blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-8541</link>
		<dc:creator>New to blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 02:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/#comment-8541</guid>
		<description>At least they are trying to be more user friendly. If it does not work out, they can always go back to Dewey, right? Great headline by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least they are trying to be more user friendly. If it does not work out, they can always go back to Dewey, right? Great headline by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Rowe</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-8537</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Rowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 22:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/#comment-8537</guid>
		<description>Oh, please!  Name one bookstore that has as many volumes as an ordinary public library.  It will be a disorganized mess without some system of classification.

I have issues with Dewey&#039;s American-centric and Eurocentric system of organization, but it&#039;s still a whole sight better than what the bookstores do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, please!  Name one bookstore that has as many volumes as an ordinary public library.  It will be a disorganized mess without some system of classification.</p>
<p>I have issues with Dewey&#8217;s American-centric and Eurocentric system of organization, but it&#8217;s still a whole sight better than what the bookstores do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leo</title>
		<link>http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-8534</link>
		<dc:creator>leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/#comment-8534</guid>
		<description>Great, now the Book I can&#039;t find at Borders I won&#039;t be able to find at the library as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, now the Book I can&#8217;t find at Borders I won&#8217;t be able to find at the library as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.librarystuff.net/2007/05/30/no-dewey-for-you/feed/ ) in 0.32223 seconds, on Feb 12th, 2012 at 8:12 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 12th, 2012 at 9:12 am UTC -->
